Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |
| switch:alps_skcc_gray [29 Dec 2023 21:41] – minor edits for flow eris | switch:alps_skcc_gray [29 Dec 2023 21:41] (current) – eris |
|---|
| The switch was likely in production from 1979((Earliest calculator sightings)). No end date is known. | The switch was likely in production from 1979((Earliest calculator sightings)). No end date is known. |
| |
| Interestingly, the mount used in SKCC Gray is not the same as either SKCC Cream or SKCC Tall Cream, although in the case of SKCC Tall Cream the mount is almost identical with the nubs on the cruciform being positioned differently but the dimensions of the cruciform itself is the same between both switches. While it could likely be possible to mount SKCC Gray caps on SKCC Tall Cream switches and vice versa, the nubs on the cruciform are positioned differently between the two switches and doing so is likely to stress the keycap mount and could damage the keycap. The unique mount of SKCC Gray is additional evidence for it serving as a replacement for AKC (spring bridge) switches. | Interestingly, the mount used in SKCC Gray is not the same as either SKCC Cream or SKCC Tall Cream, although in the case of SKCC Tall Cream the mount is almost identical with the nubs on the cruciform being positioned differently but the dimensions of the cruciform itself is the same between both switches. |
| | |
| | While it could likely be possible to mount SKCC Gray caps on SKCC Tall Cream switches and vice versa, the nubs on the cruciform are positioned differently between the two switches and doing so is likely to stress the keycap mount and could damage the keycap. The unique mount of SKCC Gray is additional evidence for it serving as a replacement for AKC (spring bridge) switches. |
| |
| ==== Gallery ==== | ==== Gallery ==== |
